Beginning in May, rumors swirled that Sultan bin Salman, the well-know former astronaut, had been barred from travelling outside the Kingdom. This was shocking in itself, given that Sultan is as close to the "inner sanctum" as one can get, being the king's son and brother of the crown prince, and an influential behind the scenes player in his own right who often acts as a mediator in family relations. But the mild-mannered prince, unlike more outspoken members of the family, had been an uncritical bystander during the rise of his powerful half-brother Muhammad (known as MbS), and was unlikely to have been the target of retaliation for any perceived opposition. Was there tension beneath the surface, or were the rumors, like so many originating from dubious sources, completely unfounded?
Only a few days later, Sultan found himself appointed as Special Advisor to the king, at the rank of Minister. Either this was pure coincidence (whether the speculation was true or not), or else the king had stepped in and taken the bullseye off Sultan's back. Even if the position of advisor is not particularly significant in terms of political influence, it does mark out a delineation between those elevated to favor, with direct and personal access to the monarch, and all the rest. The message is: Sultan is off limits. If MbS had been suspicious of his sibling, he must now respect the new boundaries.
A similar dynamic has played out before. Another brother of the crown prince, Abd al-Aziz, was thought to have been in the sights of MbS, due to his forthright views on official policy, which diverged from what MbS was championing at the time. Despite Abd al-Aziz being well within his rights to express his views on the Kingdom's use of energy resources (he was in fact Minister of State for Energy, Industry and Mineral Resources), the crown prince would not brook disagreement. Nonetheless, the king made clear that Abd al-Aziz was not to be brushed aside. Though there can be only one heir and crown prince, and MbS was clearly the favorite, still, there is such a thing as getting too big for one's britches. MbS was perceived (by the king, perhaps too late as this had been the prevailing view for some time among the family at large) as being dismissive of all, and unwilling to heed anyone's judgement but his own. In the event, Abd al-Aziz was appointed Minister of Energy in September, 2019, which may again have been purely coincidental, but it did send the unambiguous message that he was very much in royal favor, despite any falling out with the crown prince. In addition, the role formally gives the family direct control over energy policy, whereas the royals had always before tried to keep it at arm's length, even if only for appearance's sake. The fact that Abd al-Aziz oversees the lifeblood of the Kingdom, essentially, gives his portfolio an outsized importance.
The question at the time involved the king - to what extent was Salman still in charge? Did the stamp of approval for the role of Abd al-Aziz mean he wanted to put in place a counterweight to the unexpectedly rapid rise of MbS, being wary of his overweening ambition, or was the background drama really no drama at all, and the rearrangement just a mundane formality? The talk, then as now, was about the king's health - his mental faculties and physical health. If, as some believed, Salman was on his last legs, then MbS was running the show and his father merely a passive observer from his dotage. But if Salman was more in control than sensationalizing western commentators gave him credit for, then he was still able to stamp his authority on matters when needed. Under this scenario, MbS was allowed nearly full reign, but the king watched carefully from the sidelines, intervening only when he thought his son had taken things too far. In that case, Salman's job was to rebalance, without taking away from his son's lustre, before stepping back again.
|
War, Peace and Politics - The Royal Family and Palestine (Part II)
After the death of the first Saudi king, Abd al-Aziz, his son Saud took the throne. Despite taking the Palestinian issue to heart, the new monarch was unable to ever fully comprehend the depth of American support for Israel. In the end, Saud's weak leadership, disinterest, and lack of regional clout frustrated his scattered and unfocused efforts at resolution. |
|
War, Peace and Politics - The Royal Family and Palestine (Part I)
The October 7 surprise attack on Israel by Hamas, and the resulting war this precipitated, has exposed the shortcomings of the Abraham Accords. Further, the lack of available arrows in the Saudi diplomatic quiver highlights the failure of decades-long efforts to reach a meaningful consensus on the issue of Palestinian statehood. Yet, starting with the reign of the Kingdom's founder, Abd al-Aziz, solidarity with Palestine and opposition to the Zionist project has been a core tenet of the royal identity. |
|
Stage Management: Spectacles, Sidelining And Dissent
Even as the Kingdom takes steps towards cultural liberalization, an intense crackdown on activists and political dissidents continues unabated. Can the attempt to change its international image be reconciled with the extraordinary sentences being handed down by the courts? |
|
A Royal in Morocco: The Strange Case of Princess Fahda al-Hithlayn
News of the lavish Moroccan holiday of Fahda, the wife of Saudi King Salman, seems to fly in the face of widespread reports of her supposed captivity on the orders of her own son, the crown prince. Was the sensational allegation by foreign intelligence agencies flawed, or has a family reconciliation taken place? |
|
Reform, Crackdown and Succession: Continuity or Disruption?
As the crown prince and de facto regent Muhammad bin Salman presses ahead with an ambitious program of social and structural reforms, it is often assumed that he is pursuing a radically vision than that preferred by his more conservative father, King Salman. A closer look, however, reveals that the two are in fact closely aligned. |